1.What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? - Purpose of the speech was to inform audience how to stop smoking. The presenter gave four different ways to quit smoking, in very organized way.
2.Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? - There was a hook which was quite effective. But I feel sorry that he started his hook with verbal filler('um') and stuttered some words.
3.Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? -It was logical that the presenter stated four ways to restrain smoking with appropriate supporting details of his own and transitions like 'first','second' and 'then' etc.
4.Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? -He clearly restated his four points using his fingers so that audience can focus on the summarized points. Closing was also memorable because the presenter emphasized determination once again.
5.Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids, -He did not show any enthusiasm, humor and visual aids which could make whole presentation little bit boring. He paused time to time with verbal fillers and stuttering and I think this can be improved by a practice.
6.What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. -He constantly watches on camera and is standing up straight toward the audience which is great, but the hand gestures are sometimes too loud and frequent.
7.Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? -Volume was good and I would like to give high marks for the enunciation and pronunciation. It was easy to follow through the whole video. Thanks!
Title: how to quit smoking Evaluator: Doyoun Kim Speaker: Sung ji young
Speech value 5 : This topic is very interesting as a non-smoker as it gives a much more detailed and personal experience of a smoker Preparation value 5 : He had empirical evidence and data to back up what he was saying .And his telling of his experience was very relevant Organization value 4 : There were clear organization in his body and kept reminding the viewer of where his speech exactly was Opening 5 : It was interesting as the cigarette caught my attention. Body 4 : Good content with good explanation of his methods of how to stop smoking Conclusion 4 : Concluded the speech well and also reminded us of what his objective was for the speech Transitions 4 : His transition is smooth and he constantly reminds us of where in his speech we are, also helps to carry on in his speech He could have made use of PPT or even visuals
Title: Death Evaluator: Doyoun Kim Speaker: Seo Jaekyung
Speech value 5 : It is a very interesting topic as no-one really thinks about it very deeply Preparation value 5 : She had ppt and gave very good presentation about her speech Organization value 4 : It is organized well with a very good opening quote and question, personal experience oriented body and finally the objective of the speech. Opening 5 : With such a shocking topic, she is able to ask a very puzzling question. It is a very good opening Body 5 : With her personal experience of death, she is able to give a very good body of her speech. Conclusion 4 : The objective of her speech is reminded in the end again and gives us all something to think about which was very good. Transitions 5 : From her question to answer, to her experience and finally her thought. It was a very smooth transition She could have talked a bit louder and used more gestures or intonations
Generic Presentation Evaluation Major Assingment 1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? - The overall purpose of the speech was about how to stop smoking and there are four basic steps to do it, brush your teeth, chew gum, take medication, and determination. It was very useful information and well organized. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? -Yes, there was a hook, he grabbed attention by telling that there is only 1% of chance to quit smoking and 99% chance of smoking again. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? -Yes, he did well organized his structure in logical order, supported his four basic steps by giving examples how to do it and he did not have any problem using transitions. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? -Yes, he restated about four basic steps to quit smoking and it depends on our determination to quit or restrain it. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids, -Yes, he had appropriate pauses but without visual aids. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. -His posture and gesture were appropriate and he had good eye contact. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? -The volume was perfect, he had clear tone, and he is very fluent speaking in English.
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? - How to stop smoking. It was clearly delivered 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? - yes there was a hook. He gave an interesting information at the beginning 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? - yes, He gave four ways to stop smoking supported with good explanation 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? - Yes it was concise and I liked how he restated the points at the end 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids, - Yes he looked enthusiastic and his pauses were good. Although maybe some visual aids might have improved his speech 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. - The gesture, body language and especially the eye contact was really good and natural 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? - The volume was good and it was clearly understandable
Evaluator: Cho seong in Date: 6. 8 Title: A great vacation plan 1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? He wanted to visit the UK. He did say where he want to visit, why he want to and the experience. It was well addressed. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? There was a hook. And I think it was effective. It kept drawing my attention. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? I think it was logical. The examples did support the reason why he want to visit. Also it was good transition. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? The main point was restated and the closing was memorable enough for me. The conclusion was concise. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids, There were visual aids which helped me to notice tourist attractions. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. He kept making gestures and his facial expressions made the presentation much good. Also he kept making eye contact with the audiences. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? It was audible and clear enough to listen. Even though the pace of the speaking was a little fast, it was good.
What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? He talks about the three stages that lead to a breakup. It was addressed okay.
Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? Yes, but he kind of repeated the word breakups too much in the beginning that it made it not that effective.
Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? Yes. He explains point by point how breakups happen. Conflict, annoyance, and triggering point. The transitions were smooth.
Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? Yes. It was memorable since he reminds us about the stages that could indicate a possible breakup.
Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids? Apart from visual aid, he had everything.
What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? Everything was good. I understood everything and I think the posture, eye contact and gestures were on point.
Generic Presentation Evaluation Speaker: Sung ji young. Evaluator: Heo Sung Ji
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? : He argued that donation system of accepting student to university has to be legal. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? :Yes, he started his speech by speaking main word, this made me wonder what his topic. It was effective hook. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? :Yes, he said two reasons to persuade audience. And also, the points were supported by proper examples such as Gunguk university. Transitions between his two reasons were also good and natural. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? :He finished his speech well because he quoted CNN survey outcome. This made his speech reasonable. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids? : He didn’t use any visual aids but he paused well so I can follow him well. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gesture s. :Overall, his eye contact and gesture were good enough so this made me comfortable and made his speech memorable. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? : Yes, his voice was loud and clear enough I can understand what he said and I followed him without any visual aid. Perfect.
201102634 Lee Jae Hyun
ReplyDeleteEvaluation for '6. Major 2'
1.What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
- Purpose of the speech was to inform audience how to stop smoking. The presenter gave four different ways to quit smoking, in very organized way.
2.Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
- There was a hook which was quite effective. But I feel sorry that he started his hook with verbal filler('um') and stuttered some words.
3.Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
-It was logical that the presenter stated four ways to restrain smoking with appropriate supporting details of his own and transitions like 'first','second' and 'then' etc.
4.Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
-He clearly restated his four points using his fingers so that audience can focus on the summarized points. Closing was also memorable because the presenter emphasized determination once again.
5.Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
-He did not show any enthusiasm, humor and visual aids which could make whole presentation little bit boring. He paused time to time with verbal fillers and stuttering and I think this can be improved by a practice.
6.What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
-He constantly watches on camera and is standing up straight toward the audience which is great, but the hand gestures are sometimes too loud and frequent.
7.Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
-Volume was good and I would like to give high marks for the enunciation and pronunciation. It was easy to follow through the whole video. Thanks!
Title: how to quit smoking
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Doyoun Kim
Speaker: Sung ji young
Speech value 5
: This topic is very interesting as a non-smoker as it gives a much more detailed and personal experience of a smoker
Preparation value 5
: He had empirical evidence and data to back up what he was saying .And his telling of his experience was very relevant
Organization value 4
: There were clear organization in his body and kept reminding the viewer of where his speech exactly was
Opening 5
: It was interesting as the cigarette caught my attention.
Body 4
: Good content with good explanation of his methods of how to stop smoking
Conclusion 4
: Concluded the speech well and also reminded us of what his objective was for the speech
Transitions 4
: His transition is smooth and he constantly reminds us of where in his speech we are, also helps to carry on in his speech
He could have made use of PPT or even visuals
Title: Death
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Doyoun Kim
Speaker: Seo Jaekyung
Speech value 5
: It is a very interesting topic as no-one really thinks about it very deeply
Preparation value 5
: She had ppt and gave very good presentation about her speech
Organization value 4
: It is organized well with a very good opening quote and question, personal experience oriented body and finally the objective of the speech.
Opening 5
: With such a shocking topic, she is able to ask a very puzzling question. It is a very good opening
Body 5
: With her personal experience of death, she is able to give a very good body of her speech.
Conclusion 4
: The objective of her speech is reminded in the end again and gives us all something to think about which was very good.
Transitions 5
: From her question to answer, to her experience and finally her thought. It was a very smooth transition
She could have talked a bit louder and used more gestures or intonations
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteMajor Assingment
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
- The overall purpose of the speech was about how to stop smoking and there are four basic steps to do it, brush your teeth, chew gum, take medication, and determination. It was very useful information and well organized.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
-Yes, there was a hook, he grabbed attention by telling that there is only 1% of chance to quit smoking and 99% chance of smoking again.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
-Yes, he did well organized his structure in logical order, supported his four basic steps by giving examples how to do it and he did not have any problem using transitions.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
-Yes, he restated about four basic steps to quit smoking and it depends on our determination to quit or restrain it.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
-Yes, he had appropriate pauses but without visual aids.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
-His posture and gesture were appropriate and he had good eye contact.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
-The volume was perfect, he had clear tone, and he is very fluent speaking in English.
Jaewon choi- Tuesday9
ReplyDeletemajor2
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
- How to stop smoking. It was clearly delivered
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
- yes there was a hook. He gave an interesting information at the beginning
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
- yes, He gave four ways to stop smoking supported with good explanation
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
- Yes it was concise and I liked how he restated the points at the end
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
- Yes he looked enthusiastic and his pauses were good. Although maybe some visual aids might have improved his speech
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
- The gesture, body language and especially the eye contact was really good and natural
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
- The volume was good and it was clearly understandable
Evaluator: Cho seong in
ReplyDeleteDate: 6. 8
Title: A great vacation plan
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
He wanted to visit the UK. He did say where he want to visit, why he want to and the experience. It was well addressed.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
There was a hook. And I think it was effective. It kept drawing my attention.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
I think it was logical. The examples did support the reason why he want to visit. Also it was good transition.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
The main point was restated and the closing was memorable enough for me. The conclusion was concise.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
There were visual aids which helped me to notice tourist attractions.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
He kept making gestures and his facial expressions made the presentation much good. Also he kept making eye contact with the audiences.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
It was audible and clear enough to listen. Even though the pace of the speaking was a little fast, it was good.
Dae Young Kyoung 201500110
ReplyDelete4) Opinion
Generic Presentation Evaluation
What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
He talks about the three stages that lead to a breakup. It was addressed okay.
Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
Yes, but he kind of repeated the word breakups too much in the beginning that it made it not that effective.
Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
Yes. He explains point by point how breakups happen. Conflict, annoyance, and triggering point. The transitions were smooth.
Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
Yes. It was memorable since he reminds us about the stages that could indicate a possible breakup.
Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
Apart from visual aid, he had everything.
What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Everything was good. I understood everything and I think the posture, eye contact and gestures were on point.
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteSpeaker: Sung ji young.
Evaluator: Heo Sung Ji
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
: He argued that donation system of accepting student to university has to be legal.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
:Yes, he started his speech by speaking main word, this made me wonder what his topic. It was effective hook.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
:Yes, he said two reasons to persuade audience. And also, the points were supported by proper examples such as Gunguk university. Transitions between his two reasons were also good and natural.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
:He finished his speech well because he quoted CNN survey outcome. This made his speech reasonable.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
: He didn’t use any visual aids but he paused well so I can follow him well.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gesture s.
:Overall, his eye contact and gesture were good enough so this made me comfortable and made his speech memorable.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
: Yes, his voice was loud and clear enough I can understand what he said and I followed him without any visual aid. Perfect.