1. A Person I admire
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQtsmd7eyWQ&t=9s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQtsmd7eyWQ&t=9s
2. A Great Vacation Idea
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XE_YVPLj-4o&t=56s4. How to speech
5. In My Opinion
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrwyLQI1eW8
201102634 Lee Jae Hyun
ReplyDeleteJune 5th, evaluation for '6. Major 2'
1.What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
- The purpose of speech was to tell audience how Youtube has changed people's lives. It was supported by several reasons and very well delivered.
2.Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
- I could not find one. The statistic part was somehow like a hook but I think the presenter went right into the body part without intro.
3.Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
- Yes because she gave reasons why she likes Youtube and how effective it is to human being. But I think the Justin Bieber example at 'helping people get discovered' was a bit ambiguous because that singer also has to do with entertainment industry and this makes her next reason, 'revolutionized entertainment' like a repetition.
4.Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
- I could not find clear conclusion. It might have been better to just list again her points why Youtube is awesome.
5.Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
- I could feel that the speaker is enthusiastic as she keeps talking about the same subject. It seemed that she really love Youtube. Her visual was very effective and organized very clearly.
6.What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
-Half of her body was concealed by podium so I could not notice something useful about her gesture and body languages. But I saw she constantly checking what's on the podium. Maybe note card, but she looked down very often.
7.Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
- Sound was good. And I think she is native speaker that she is perfect in enunciation and pronunciation.
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDelete(Major 2 : About Youtube)
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
How Youtube is being a part of our lives and interesting facts about the site. It was well addressed throughout the speech as well as in the opening and in the conclusion.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
There was an effective hook with intriguing statistics of Youtube, which instantly caught attention.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
There were some good detailed examples that kept me very focused on the speech. They were interesting and went along very well with each points.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
The conclusion nicely wrapped up her speech by restating why she like Youtube and chose the topic.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
She used nice visual aids with good wordings on the slides that helped understand each points. There was not much use of humor, so maybe it will be even better if she includes them.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
Her posture was stable and she looks at the audience time to time, but her eye contact was a little bit staying too much on the notes(on the table).
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Yes, it was very clear so I could understand everything.
Jaewon choi- Tuesday9
ReplyDeletea great vacation idea
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
- To explain her best vacation idea. The main point was clear and well addressed
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
- Yes she talked about bed time stories and it was quite interesting
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
- Yes, She gave clear reasons as to why she chose new zealand
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
- It was concise but maybe it could’ve been better if she summarized her points at the end
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
- She was very enthusiastic and looked happy talking about it. Also there were lots of visual aids
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
- The body language was good but maybe she could improve her posture and I think it could’ve been better if she stood a bit more to the right rather than covering the ppt
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
- The volume was good and it was clearly understandable
Evaluator : 201401933 Soyun OH, Tues. 9 A.M.
ReplyDelete4. How to speech
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
How to make coffee using classic coffee machine.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
She supposed a situation where brand-new coffee machine broke out, so that we have no choices but to use old coffee machine. It gave motivation to the viewer to learn how use old coffee machine, which also urged them more concentrate on her speech!^-^
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
She used transitions like ‘step number 1’, ‘number 2’, which gave neat and logical structure to her speech. Ideas were smoothly connected.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
Since her speech was about how to make coffee, I think it was clever that she ended by giving some tips to enjoy coffee: you can add sugar or milk to it. Also, her main point was well stressed out: without using any electricity, you can make perfect coffee with espresso coffee maker!
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids
Yes, she did. It was humorous enough, especially the beginning part. I could see that the presenter was enthusiastic of the topic, which made me become more interested too in the subject. Also, it seemed that the speaker put a pretty lot of efforts and time preparing her visual aids. Each idea was accompanied by a slide, which helped the audience get clearer idea.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
She gave clearer explanation directly pointing out images on the screen, using her hands. Also, natural eye contact and gestures were impressive.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
The volume was excellent, perfect tone, and pronunciation. Every single word was clearly enunciated! Thank you for your exciting, well-made speech!:D
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Park So Yeon/ Tue 11
Presenter: Lina Motzkuhn
Presentation Topic: Ice Breaker Speech
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
-An introduction of herself. How she came to Korea, why she stayed, etc.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
-I think she jumped into her speech but it was okay
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
-Yes she had a nice structure and a smooth transition between her ideas
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
-She tried to wrap up her opinion in the end
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
-She didn’t use visual aids but she made jokes to amuse the audience
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
-She made good eye contact but her posture was a bit slanted
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
-She spoke in a slow pace which was easy to follow and she spoke clearly as well. It was very easy to understand her speech.
Dae Young Kyoung 201500110
ReplyDelete4)How to speech
Generic Presentation Evaluation
What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
She explains why we should use an old coffee maker and also states the cons of it compared to the modern ones. It was addressed very directly and clean.
Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
Yes, she used a hook to attract coffee lovers. I believe it was effective. I don’t think it needs to be improved.
Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
Yes. She knew what she was talking about, as if she owned the coffee maker. The transitions were smooth.
Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
The conclusion fits the theme very well, but since I don’t drink coffee, for me it wasn’t memorable, although for those who love coffee I would believe it was memorable.
Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
Yes. She had everything.
What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Everything was good. The fact that she walked towards the screen to point out the parts of the coffee maker made it more interesting.
Title: Major 2
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: 201601578 Jaekyung Seo (TUES 11-13)
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech? Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
You talked about youtube in general. Your main idea was that youtube makes the world smaller. Also, you talked about the positive effects of youtube and gave examples related with your points.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
I think your hook was great. First, the topic itself was interesting, and second, the statistics you gave were really interesting. It really caught my attention from the beginning right away.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
I think your structure was logical and well sorted out. You divided the reasons, and explained them well in your body. They were all strong and linked together. They seemed to play along with each other well.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
I think your conclusion was good. You rounded up your speech, but I think it would have been better if you had more time. You seemed to be in a rush at the end, but it still had all the elements you needed.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
To say honestly, your visual aids were great. Your powerpoint slides are really well made, and they caught my attention right away. They were neat and clean, and had all the information that it should have. Also, I loved your little jokes. They were something I could sympathize with you..
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
I couldn’t see you well enough and I think it would have been better if you stepped out, but it wasn’t distracting. Your postures were good, and eye contact was also good.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
I think your voice was loud and clear for me to understand. You gave adequate pauses when it was needed. Your tone and pronunciation was also good, and I had no difficulty understanding you.