Generic Presentation Evaluation (5. In my opinion) 1.What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? To explain why we should stop building nuclear power plants. She mentioned the potential threats of nuclear power plants, and also the counter arguments of those who support nuclear power. Then the speaker refuted the idea by saying that it is not actually efficient compared to other renewable energy. The purpose of the speech and main points were clearly addressed as the speaker had a clear organization of her speech with good transitions.
2.Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? The speaker introduced the recent accident that took place in Japan to relate it to her topic. I think it was effective because the issue of the accident was very much relevant to our country, Korea. I think it would have been better if she emphasized the importance of the incident through a little bit of exaggerated facial expressions or stress so that she would effectively draw people’s attention in the beginning.
3.Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? The structure was logical. The presenter provided several evidence with specific examples. Also, clear use of transitions such as “first”, “however”, and “so” helped the audience to follow the structure of her presentation.
4.Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? The conclusion was concise. The speaker restated her thesis once more in the end to make her points clearer. Also, she shortly summarized her main points that she introduced during the presentation. I believe the closing could be improved by making a more memorable closing such as introducing a quote or using a bit of humor.
5.Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids, The speaker did not have visual aids, but the organization of the presentation was clear enough to understand. Because she had lots of specific examples in both sides of the arguments, her thesis seemed more reasonable and persuasive. I think the speaker prepared well in choosing his topic and coming up with the main points.
6.What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. The speaker kept on looking at the camera which made me feel like she was telling her story in front of me. Her posture was good, but she rarely made gestures throughout the presentation. I think she can work on taking advantage of some gestures next time.
7.Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? I think the volume and tone of her voice were good. Especially, the volume was loud enough to hear her voice clearly. Also, her speech rate and pausing were appropriate and I was able to understand most of the presentation.
Title: Person I admire Evaluator: Doyoun Kim Speaker: Minhee Woo
Speech value 4 : This speech is about Jack ma the founder of Alibaba, it is interesting as she tells us of someone very famous we did not know, and gives very good reason as to why she admires him Preparation value 4 : She gave background information of the person and the site. Some interviews and what Jack Ma did outside of his work. Shows good preparation. Organization value 4 : The organization was well thought of and clear introduction body and conclusion Opening 4 : I knew the site Alibaba so I wanted to know more. With this well-known company it gives me more motive to stay concentrated Body 5 : Good content with history of the person and what he stands for Conclusion 4 : Concluded the speech well with what she wants to do later on, with motivation from Jack Ma. But a bit abrupt could have given more self-experience or relatable content Transitions 4 : Transition is smooth and it has a very natural flow. Her body motion is too rigid and she could have used hand gestures or even body motion to help her speech
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? -the person she admires most. Jack ma the counder of ali baba 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? -she talked about Ali baba so it was okay but maybe it couldve been better if she gave some more interesting facts 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? -it was logically supported with her reasons and some brief explanation about the person 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? -the conclusion was good with her mentioning how she became motivated by the person 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids, -her pauses and flow was very calm and good. I liked how she sounded enthusiastic 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. -posture and eye contact where good and natural but maybe a little bit of gestures would have made the speech more natural. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? -everything was clearly understandable.
Generic Presentation Evaluation Speaker: Woo Min Hee Evaluator: Heo Sung Ji
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? : She explained about our environment and market of pet and pet owners in Korea. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? : She started her speech by introducing new jobs related to trend : pet. It was good because problem of pet is issued nowadays , so this is interesting enough to capture people’s attention. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? : She used some survey outcome and compared that with last year and this year. This was good. And she has good transitions from body to conclusion. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? :She suggested some reason that why she thought many people tried to coexist between pet owner and non-pet owner. It was good but if feels me that she didn’t summarized but suggested new things. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor 6. , visual aids? : She did not use any visual aids, so it was hard to follow her presentation. She gave some survey outcome, so it will be better if she uses some visual aids to explain her survey. 7. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. : She speaks just in one posture. She stands strictly , sometimes she uses some gestures but it will be better she moves around and uses more gestures. 8. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? : The volume and pronunciation were very good. She said clearly so everything could be understand, but as I said above if she uses some visual aids that will be help me to understand more easily.
Generic Presentation Evaluation Evaluator: Park So Yeon/ Tue 11 Presenter: Minhee Woo Presentation Topic: Major Assignment 2 1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? -The four different types of legal models for prostitution (full criminalization, partial criminalization, legalization, decriminalization) and her personal opinion. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? -Yes she introduced why she chose the speech topic. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? -Yes she had a very good structure and had good. smooth transitions between her ideas 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? -She tried to wrap up her opinion in the end 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids? -She used very nice visual aids which helped the audience understand her speech 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. -She made many hand gestures, made great eye contact, and she had an upright posture 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? -She spoke in a slow pace which was easy to follow and she spoke clearly as well. It was very easy to understand.
Evaluater:Hyunjeong Song title:The person who I admire
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? She introduced the people who she admires and she states why she admires Jack ma the founder of Alibaba with solid reasons.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? Yes the hook was clearly stated but it could have been much better if she had introduced more interesting facts.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? Yes it was. She suggested appropriate and detailed examples, explaining the reasons why she admires Jack ma the founder of Alibaba and the achivements he had made.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? It was concise and manifest. The main points were briefly mentioned, and the closing part where she connected herself with the subject of the speech was quite memorable.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids? Yes she did. I could see she tried hard to put a lot of effort to the presentation.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. She showed some gestures, trying to make sure she was not standing too stiff. She made constant eye contact with the audiences. Her overall posture and gestures were above what was expected.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? The volume was very clear, with very nice intonation and stable pronunciation.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteGeneric Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDelete(5. In my opinion)
1.What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
To explain why we should stop building nuclear power plants. She mentioned the potential threats of nuclear power plants, and also the counter arguments of those who support nuclear power. Then the speaker refuted the idea by saying that it is not actually efficient compared to other renewable energy. The purpose of the speech and main points were clearly addressed as the speaker had a clear organization of her speech with good transitions.
2.Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
The speaker introduced the recent accident that took place in Japan to relate it to her topic. I think it was effective because the issue of the accident was very much relevant to our country, Korea. I think it would have been better if she emphasized the importance of the incident through a little bit of exaggerated facial expressions or stress so that she would effectively draw people’s attention in the beginning.
3.Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
The structure was logical. The presenter provided several evidence with specific examples. Also, clear use of transitions such as “first”, “however”, and “so” helped the audience to follow the structure of her presentation.
4.Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
The conclusion was concise. The speaker restated her thesis once more in the end to make her points clearer. Also, she shortly summarized her main points that she introduced during the presentation. I believe the closing could be improved by making a more memorable closing such as introducing a quote or using a bit of humor.
5.Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
The speaker did not have visual aids, but the organization of the presentation was clear enough to understand. Because she had lots of specific examples in both sides of the arguments, her thesis seemed more reasonable and persuasive. I think the speaker prepared well in choosing his topic and coming up with the main points.
6.What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
The speaker kept on looking at the camera which made me feel like she was telling her story in front of me. Her posture was good, but she rarely made gestures throughout the presentation. I think she can work on taking advantage of some gestures next time.
7.Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
I think the volume and tone of her voice were good. Especially, the volume was loud enough to hear her voice clearly. Also, her speech rate and pausing were appropriate and I was able to understand most of the presentation.
201202334 Kweonho Lee
Title: Person I admire
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Doyoun Kim
Speaker: Minhee Woo
Speech value 4
: This speech is about Jack ma the founder of Alibaba, it is interesting as she tells us of someone very famous we did not know, and gives very good reason as to why she admires him
Preparation value 4
: She gave background information of the person and the site. Some interviews and what Jack Ma did outside of his work. Shows good preparation.
Organization value 4
: The organization was well thought of and clear introduction body and conclusion
Opening 4
: I knew the site Alibaba so I wanted to know more. With this well-known company it gives me more motive to stay concentrated
Body 5
: Good content with history of the person and what he stands for
Conclusion 4
: Concluded the speech well with what she wants to do later on, with motivation from Jack Ma. But a bit abrupt could have given more self-experience or relatable content
Transitions 4
: Transition is smooth and it has a very natural flow.
Her body motion is too rigid and she could have used hand gestures or even body motion to help her speech
Jaewon choi-Tuesday9
ReplyDeleteThe person I admire
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
-the person she admires most. Jack ma the counder of ali baba
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
-she talked about Ali baba so it was okay but maybe it couldve been better if she gave some more interesting facts
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
-it was logically supported with her reasons and some brief explanation about the person
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
-the conclusion was good with her mentioning how she became motivated by the person
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
-her pauses and flow was very calm and good. I liked how she sounded enthusiastic
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
-posture and eye contact where good and natural but maybe a little bit of gestures would have made the speech more natural.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
-everything was clearly understandable.
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteSpeaker: Woo Min Hee
Evaluator: Heo Sung Ji
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
: She explained about our environment and market of pet and pet owners in Korea.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
: She started her speech by introducing new jobs related to trend : pet. It was good because problem of pet is issued nowadays , so this is interesting enough to capture people’s attention.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
: She used some survey outcome and compared that with last year and this year. This was good. And she has good transitions from body to conclusion.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
:She suggested some reason that why she thought many people tried to coexist between pet owner and non-pet owner. It was good but if feels me that she didn’t summarized but suggested new things.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor
6. , visual aids?
: She did not use any visual aids, so it was hard to follow her presentation. She gave some survey outcome, so it will be better if she uses some visual aids to explain her survey.
7. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
: She speaks just in one posture. She stands strictly , sometimes she uses some gestures but it will be better she moves around and uses more gestures.
8. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
: The volume and pronunciation were very good. She said clearly so everything could be understand, but as I said above if she uses some visual aids that will be help me to understand more easily.
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Park So Yeon/ Tue 11
Presenter: Minhee Woo
Presentation Topic: Major Assignment 2
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
-The four different types of legal models for prostitution (full criminalization, partial criminalization, legalization, decriminalization) and her personal opinion.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
-Yes she introduced why she chose the speech topic.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
-Yes she had a very good structure and had good. smooth transitions between her ideas
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
-She tried to wrap up her opinion in the end
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
-She used very nice visual aids which helped the audience understand her speech
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
-She made many hand gestures, made great eye contact, and she had an upright posture
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
-She spoke in a slow pace which was easy to follow and she spoke clearly as well. It was very easy to understand.
Evaluater:Hyunjeong Song
ReplyDeletetitle:The person who I admire
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
She introduced the people who she admires and she states why she admires Jack ma the founder of Alibaba with solid reasons.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
Yes the hook was clearly stated but it could have been much better if she had introduced more interesting facts.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
Yes it was. She suggested appropriate and detailed examples, explaining the reasons why she admires Jack ma the founder of Alibaba and the achivements he had made.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
It was concise and manifest. The main points were briefly mentioned, and the closing part where she connected herself with the subject of the speech was quite memorable.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
Yes she did. I could see she tried hard to put a lot of effort to the presentation.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
She showed some gestures, trying to make sure she was not standing too stiff. She made constant eye contact with the audiences. Her overall posture and gestures were above what was expected.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly?
The volume was very clear, with very nice intonation and stable pronunciation.