Evaluator:Moon jun young Date:6.7 Title:Ice breaker
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? The speaker tried to inform that everything and everyone around us is important to us.The speaker gave the audience the real story and visual aids. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? yes.and It was very important.I think precendent questions can be arranged before hook. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? Yes It is very logical and natural.He provided stories of his friend and his toy.Good transitions were done.When he transit the story of toys to that of friend, he used "however" And when he concluded the speach he said "main pont is that..." So I can confidently say that trainsitions were good. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? Yes It was very cocise, main points were restated or summarized.Yes memorable. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids, He used visaul aids.It was effective. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.He seemed to fix his eye contact with his audience.And his gestures were natural.And posture was not distracting 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? Everything was audible and clear and easy to understand.
Evaluator:Jang Hajong Date:6.7 Title:the person who i admire
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? Speakers want to introduce Obama as a person who he admires. It was well addressed. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? Yes. Good. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? Yes It is very logical. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? yes. I could easily remember. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids, He used visaul aids.It was effective? Yes. All things are good. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? I think it`s appropriate. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? yes. Perfect to understand.
Evaluator: Cho seong in Date: 6. 8 Title: Person I admire 1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? He admires the former president of the United States, Barrack Obama. After telling two reasons why speaker admires him, he told why he chose Obama as a target. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? I think there was a hook. And it drew my attention. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? It was logical. He first told about the person he admires and the reason why he chose the Obama and the reasons why he admires him. The connections between the ideas were good enough to make the presentation much smooth. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? The conclusion was about the speaker’s hope. And I think it made the main points to be restated and made a memorable closing. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids, There was no visual aids, humor and other special thing. Despite this fact, the presentation was good enough to listen. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. He looked a little nervous. His hands were not moving. It just stopped moving. But he kept making eye contact with the camera. It was impressive. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? Speaker’s voice was audible and clear enough to listen. Everything could be understood. I think it was the strongest point of his speech.
What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? He talks about how great Mexico is for him, since he spent a lot of time over there in the past. It was addressed well enough, because he expressed his love for the place itself through the experiences that he had.
Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? Yes. I guess since he mentioned he was going to talk about a special place, although it already was written in the PPT. I think it could’ve been better if he somehow made it a bit more longer, like enough to make me wonder what he is talking about.
Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? Yes. He supported his point by using his own experiences. The transitions were okay but sometimes he repeated himself, like not realizing that he actually did.
Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? The conclusion was fine since he started the subject by showing his affection to it and concluded by doing the same thing.
Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids? Yes. He had everything.
What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? Not the best posture but a really friendly one. I can’t say it didn’t fit the presentation and eye contact, gestures, and volume were also good. I understood everything clearly.
Generic Presentation Evaluation Speaker: Choi jae won Evaluator: Heo Sung Ji
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? : He argued that why animal testing is bad. He agreed a little about animal testing but overall he showed his opinion that animal testing is banned and we have to find other way. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? : He started his speech by showing his opinion. It was not bad but this is a little normal. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? : Yes, he persuaded people with some reasons. The reason was good and using example of MAC was good strategic because that cosmetics is familiar to us. So it was impressed. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? :He finished his speech by showing movie story. It was proper to persuade people about why animal testing is bad. He did not summarize his reasons but this way was good enough. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids? : He used visual aids very well. He showed many photos and these helped me to understand and remember his opinion and reasons. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gesture s. : He had good eye contact and it felt me as if he said to me. He didn’t use many body language but he used proper visual aids so it was not big problem. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? : Yes, volume and pronunciation was good. It was loud and clear. So I can follow him well and notice his transition. It was good.
Evaluator:Moon jun young
ReplyDeleteDate:6.7
Title:Ice breaker
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? The speaker tried to inform that everything and everyone around us is important to us.The speaker gave the audience the real story and visual aids.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? yes.and It was very important.I think precendent questions can be arranged before hook.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
Yes It is very logical and natural.He provided stories of his friend and his toy.Good transitions were done.When he transit the story of toys to that of friend, he used "however" And when he concluded the speach he said "main pont is that..." So I can confidently say that trainsitions were good.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
Yes It was very cocise, main points were restated or summarized.Yes memorable.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids, He used visaul aids.It was effective.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.He seemed to fix his eye contact with his audience.And his gestures were natural.And posture was not distracting
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Everything was audible and clear and easy to understand.
Evaluator:Jang Hajong
ReplyDeleteDate:6.7
Title:the person who i admire
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? Speakers want to introduce Obama as a person who he admires. It was well addressed.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? Yes. Good.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
Yes It is very logical.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
yes. I could easily remember.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids, He used visaul aids.It was effective?
Yes. All things are good.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? I think it`s appropriate.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
yes. Perfect to understand.
Evaluator: Cho seong in
ReplyDeleteDate: 6. 8
Title: Person I admire
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
He admires the former president of the United States, Barrack Obama. After telling two reasons why speaker admires him, he told why he chose Obama as a target.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
I think there was a hook. And it drew my attention.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
It was logical. He first told about the person he admires and the reason why he chose the Obama and the reasons why he admires him. The connections between the ideas were good enough to make the presentation much smooth.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
The conclusion was about the speaker’s hope. And I think it made the main points to be restated and made a memorable closing.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
There was no visual aids, humor and other special thing. Despite this fact, the presentation was good enough to listen.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
He looked a little nervous. His hands were not moving. It just stopped moving. But he kept making eye contact with the camera. It was impressive.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Speaker’s voice was audible and clear enough to listen. Everything could be understood. I think it was the strongest point of his speech.
Dae Young Kyoung 201500110
ReplyDeleteGeneric Presentation Evaluation
What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
He talks about how great Mexico is for him, since he spent a lot of time over there in the past. It was addressed well enough, because he expressed his love for the place itself through the experiences that he had.
Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
Yes. I guess since he mentioned he was going to talk about a special place, although it already was written in the PPT. I think it could’ve been better if he somehow made it a bit more longer, like enough to make me wonder what he is talking about.
Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
Yes. He supported his point by using his own experiences. The transitions were okay but sometimes he repeated himself, like not realizing that he actually did.
Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
The conclusion was fine since he started the subject by showing his affection to it and concluded by doing the same thing.
Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
Yes. He had everything.
What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Not the best posture but a really friendly one. I can’t say it didn’t fit the presentation and eye contact, gestures, and volume were also good. I understood everything clearly.
2) Travel*
DeleteGeneric Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteSpeaker: Choi jae won
Evaluator: Heo Sung Ji
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
: He argued that why animal testing is bad. He agreed a little about animal testing but overall he showed his opinion that animal testing is banned and we have to find other way.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
: He started his speech by showing his opinion. It was not bad but this is a little normal.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
: Yes, he persuaded people with some reasons. The reason was good and using example of MAC was good strategic because that cosmetics is familiar to us. So it was impressed.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
:He finished his speech by showing movie story. It was proper to persuade people about why animal testing is bad. He did not summarize his reasons but this way was good enough.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
: He used visual aids very well. He showed many photos and these helped me to understand and remember his opinion and reasons.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gesture s.
: He had good eye contact and it felt me as if he said to me. He didn’t use many body language but he used proper visual aids so it was not big problem.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
: Yes, volume and pronunciation was good. It was loud and clear. So I can follow him well and notice his transition. It was good.