Generic Presentation Evaluation 1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? : : She spoke a person who she admires, actually I cannot recognize the name of person, But speaker introduced what the person did and why she admire her.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? : There was no special hook and she started her speech by introducing the person who she admires 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? : She said the reason that why she respects her logically well. The reason was good enough to understand her, and the story of the person was memorable. That helped me to remember her speech. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? : She finished her speech by explaining why that person affected her life and attitude. And this was good because this kinds of ending was proper for this topic.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids? : There was no visual aid and she spoke fast without any pause. It will be better if she write a name of her person or put a picture of the person. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. : : Her eye contact was good, maybe she memorized her script well, so it felt me that she said to me. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? : : Her voice was good and clear, but she said too fast, so I cannot follow her. It will be better if she uses some visual aids or speaks slower.
1.What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? - Purpose of the speech is making abortion legally. It is for the freedom of women. It was nice.
2.Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? - I’m not sure, but she had an example of the situation. So I could be aroused.
3.Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? -It was quite logical. I thought she connected her thoughts with nice logic with her background knowledge. It was nice. 4.Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? - I think the conclusion part was a little bit incomplete. So the closing was not so memorable. 5.Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
- None of the above were in presentation.
6.What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
- Her eye contact was nice, but there’s no memorable gestures.
7.Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
- Her pronunciation was really nice, so it was not so hard to understand the content of the presentation.
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDelete1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
: : She spoke a person who she admires, actually I cannot recognize the name of person,
But speaker introduced what the person did and why she admire her.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
: There was no special hook and she started her speech by introducing the person who she admires
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
: She said the reason that why she respects her logically well. The reason was good enough to understand her, and the story of the person was memorable. That helped me to remember her speech.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
: She finished her speech by explaining why that person affected her life and attitude. And this was good because this kinds of ending was proper for this topic.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
: There was no visual aid and she spoke fast without any pause. It will be better if she write a name of her person or put a picture of the person.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
: : Her eye contact was good, maybe she memorized her script well, so it felt me that she said to me.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
: : Her voice was good and clear, but she said too fast, so I cannot follow her. It will be better if she uses some visual aids or speaks slower.
speaker: Song Hyung jeong
Deleteevaluator: Heo sung ji
-A person who i admire-
1.What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
ReplyDelete- Purpose of the speech is making abortion legally. It is for the freedom of women. It was nice.
2.Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
- I’m not sure, but she had an example of the situation. So I could be aroused.
3.Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
-It was quite logical. I thought she connected her thoughts with nice logic with her background knowledge. It was nice.
4.Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
- I think the conclusion part was a little bit incomplete. So the closing was not so memorable.
5.Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
- None of the above were in presentation.
6.What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
- Her eye contact was nice, but there’s no memorable gestures.
7.Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
- Her pronunciation was really nice, so it was not so hard to understand the content of the presentation.
Jae Hyun Joo
Delete