1. The person I admire
https://youtu.be/34ekNZXcbyw
2. A great vacation idea
https://youtu.be/WCM0ZWj4Q_I
3. Ice breaking speech (midterm)
https://youtu.be/A-ImTT1wOvA
4. Process speech
https://youtu.be/9s35yP4fXkE
5. Opinion speech
https://youtu.be/hGrYi3nO3D4
6. Organized your speech (final project)
https://youtu.be/4ogGuLnluMI
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDelete1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
- The overall purpose of the speech was about internet shopping is more enjoyable than shopping at stores, because of the variety of options, it offers cheaper price, and lastly it is more convenient. His presentation was well organized and it was easy to follow.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
-I think it would be better by telling his personal experiences in internet shopping to get more attention from the start.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
-Yes, he did well organized his structure in logical order, supported his three main reasons by giving examples and I did not see any problem him using transitions.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
-Yes, it was. He did restate about the three benefits of shopping in internet and gave advice to the audience to stay at home and shop online.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
-Yes, he had appropriate pauses and interesting visual aids.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
-His posture and gesture were not exaggerated and he had good eye contact towards camera.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
-The volume was perfect, he had clear tone, his English pronunciation was fluent.
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDelete(The person I admire)
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
The person that the speaker admires the most is Yoo Jae Suk because he has achieved so much through hard work. It was presented very well.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
Yes, the speaker tries to connect with the audience by stating that everyone has someone that they admire. It could have been stated more interestingly, which would have made it better.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
The speaker gave enough examples of Jae Suk that showed how he achieved his success. The speaker also had clear and effective transition between ideas, which made it easy to understand.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
The conclusion was concise, however the main points were not restated or summarized. The closing was a little bit weak because it was too mild.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
The speaker did not have any visual aid or humor mixed into the presentation, which made it seem like he wasn't enthusiastic about the presentation.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
The speaker had appropriate body language and posture. Along wit nice usage of eye contact and gesture.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
The speaker had really nice pace while he was speaking, which made it seem like he is very comfortable speaking in public. There was nothing that I could not understand.
201401933 Soyun OH, Tues. 9 A.M.
ReplyDeleteGeneric Presentation Evaluation
(6. Organize Your Speech)
1.What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
The overall purpose was well addressed with three reasons why the presenter prefers online shopping to off-line one.
It offers variety of options, is cheaper, and more convenient.
2.Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
I think there was. The speaker gave specific and original examples which were unique enough to get attention of the audience: sometimes stores might not have the products you are looking for, like your favorite ‘Starbucks tumbler’, or ‘Kanye’s new easy boost’.
3.Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
The structure was logical enough. The presenter used some examples and statistics to support her thesis. Also, clear use of transitions such as “first”, “second”, and “lastly” helped the audience to follow the structure of her presentation.
4.Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
The conclusion was concise: Instead of visit shopping mall off-line, stay home and shop online. The presenter summarized his three main points in the end and had a more memorable conclusion, using a quote: You are too pretty to have to look for a parking spot!
5.Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
The speaker showed lots of enthusiasm in her preparation of visual aids and structured speech. The speaker had neat visual aids with lots of pictures to help the audience understand and she even had a short video clip to attract their attention in the beginning. The exchange of question and answer in the hook were also nice. The presenter also had appropriate pauses.
But when it comes to visual aids, I think they could have been improved. Since there were lots of sentences and images in each slide, it was not easy to recognize them all. I think that replacing them with only a few keywords and some selected images might have been more effective.
6.What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
It was especially remarkable that the speaker used adequate gestures. Every single movement fit exactly to what he mentioned. It seemed natural and helped to get the idea. Also he made proper eye contact all along the speech, which made him seem confident. Overall, his body language rendered the speech more persuasive.
7.Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
The speaker enunciated clearly with a calm, persuasive tone. Other than his perfect and clear pronunciation, what was impressive was the pace of his speech. I would say that it was a bit slower than that of others, but it actually helped enhance delivery. Although I’m not good at English, I could understand every single word.
P.S. Thank you for your comment! It helped me a lot:D
201401933 Soyun OH, Tues. 9 A.M.
ReplyDeleteSorry there are some mistakes in the previous one!
Generic Presentation Evaluation
(6. Organize Your Speech)
1.What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
The overall purpose was well addressed with three reasons why the presenter prefers online shopping to off-line one.
It offers variety of options, is cheaper, and more convenient.
2.Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
I think there was. The speaker gave specific and original examples which were unique enough to get attention of the audience: sometimes stores might not have the products you are looking for, like your favorite ‘Starbucks tumbler’, or ‘Kanye’s new easy boost’.
3.Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
The structure was logical, fairly well organized. First, he let the audience know about the advantages of internet shopping, then explained how these advantages were made possible, in a logical order. He also used some examples and statistics from clear source, for example mentioning “about 70% of the time, internet shopping had cheaper price, and thus had the price advantage compared to the off-line stores. Also, he used clear transitions such as “first”, “secondly”, and “last but not least” which helped the audience to follow the structure of the presentation.
4.Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
The conclusion was concise: Instead of visit shopping mall off-line, stay home and shop online. The presenter summarized his three main points in the end and had a more memorable conclusion, using a quote: You are too pretty to have to look for a parking spot!
5.Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids
The neat and organized speech reflects how much efforts the speaker has made preparing it. There were lots of humor, images that went well with the ideas he was delivering.
But when it comes to visual aids, I think they could have been improved. Since there were lots of sentences and images in each slide, it was not easy to recognize them all. I think that replacing them with only a few keywords and some selected images might have been more effective.
6.What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
It was especially remarkable that the speaker used adequate gestures. It seemed that every single movement fit exactly to what he mentioned. It was natural and helped to get the idea. Also he made proper eye contact all along the speech, which made him seem confident. Overall, his body language rendered the speech more persuasive.
7.Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
The speaker enunciated clearly with a calm, persuasive tone. Other than his perfect and clear pronunciation, what was impressive was the pace of his speech. I would say that it was a bit slower than that of others, but it actually helped enhance delivery. Although I’m not good at English, I could understand every single word.
Evaluator: Cho seong in
ReplyDeleteDate: 6. 8
Title: Process presentation
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
The main point was the “hair growth”. He explained the process of the hair growth. The presenter did divide the phase of it, explain the process, summarize it and finally he did give an advice. It was really interesting.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
I think there was a hook and it was effective because by using the hook, he kept drawing attention.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
The structure was logical. There were a phase. Also, there were examples about his explanations. I think it was great transitions.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
It was very concise. He did summarize the phases. He even gave us an advice.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
He kept making pauses between the sentences and it helped me to keep focus on him. Also the visual aids he used were really effective. It helped me to understand what he said.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
He kept making eye-contact and gestures. It was very ‘smooth’.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
The volume was good so it was really audible. I think all the audience can enjoy his speaking.
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Park So Yeon/ Tue 11
Presenter: Kweonho Lee
Presentation topic: A great vacation idea
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
-The advantage of going to Guam on an English Adventure Program. It is cost-effective, it has beautiful scenery, and exiting activities
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
-Yes he asked a question to introduce the topic and it was effective.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
-Yes he stated specific examples to uphold his three points and the structure of the speech was good.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
-Yes, at the end of his speech he summarized his points
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
-He used visual aids for his speech and made pauses in between his speech which was good
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
-He made good eye contact and made hand gestures
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
-He spoke slowly so I think everyone was able to understand his speech