Thursday, June 8, 2017

Jaekyung Seo/ All my presentations/ TUES 11-13

1. Person I Admire


2. Memorable Vacation


3. Icebreaker Speech


4. Unit 4 Speech


5. Should Zoos be legal?


6. Death - major assignment

2 comments:

  1. Evaluator: Emily Corbett
    Icebreaker Speech

    1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
    That the most important parts of life include no choice at all.
    This was well addressed.
    2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
    There was a hook about life equals c between b and d. Which was a good hook.
    3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
    Yes it was logical. She used her own experiences as examples. and she made good transitions between points.
    4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
    Conclusion was concise. her main points were summarized and she ended with some advice so it was memorable.
    5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
    Yes she used visual aid of the one slide but i think it should have been only at the beginning of the speech and brought back up at the end.
    6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
    Good body language. she used a lot of eye contact and gestures.
    7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
    The volume was good. her voice was clear and audible and i had no trouble understanding her speech.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Generic Presentation Evaluation
    Second speech
    Lina Motzkuhn
    1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
    The main purpose of the speech was to show why she like Guam
    2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
    Yes, she said everyone has a place they want to go to. Which is a good hook.
    3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
    Yes the structure is logical and she supports his points with personal experiences.
    4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
    The conclusion was good short but restated her main points well.
    5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
    She used a personal story which made it really nice. She did not use any visual aids.
    6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
    She keeps good eye contact and her hand gestures are not too much either.
    Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
    Yes, the volume was clear and understandable.

    ReplyDelete