1. Person I admire
https://youtu.be/WS4IdPDXA2k
2. A great vacation idea
https://youtu.be/IYmVMN0W07A
3. Ice breaking speech
https://youtu.be/LqryY_1Njbs
4. Survey
https://youtu.be/Zvbo0cb1ISM
5. In my opinion
https://youtu.be/qBfPBB5O1j8
6. Second major assignment
https://youtu.be/W0UH48ArqKo
201102634 Lee Jae Hyun
ReplyDeleteEvaluation for '6. Second major assignment'
1.What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
- To encourage university students whether to live off campus or not. It was addressed along the whole presentation as presenter's personal stories.
2.Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
- Question about where university students live during the semester. This is a good way but he could have added more confidence into it.
3.Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
-It is good that the speaker listed his own experience in time order which makes it powerful and specific enough as examples. There were some transitions heard such as 'first' and 'next' etc.
4.Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
-He states as follows, 'the message that I want to send you is...' and this is a signal transition that shows he is making conclusion. It was quite memorable.
5.Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
-He did not show any enthusiasm, humor and visual aids and that is what makes the presentation quite boring. He could at least have used visual aids since there were computers in classroom.
6.What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
- He is swaying his body time to time and in many times lean toward the podium which is an action needs to be improved.
7.Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
- There is no problem with the volume but something has to be done to his pronunciation. I could not understand some of his words. But overall, the presentation was understandable.
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDelete1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
- The overall purpose of the speech was about euthanasia that should legitimize not fully but partially. There are three reasons to admit euthanasia, if there is unbearable pain in patient, monetary problem and patient’s determination of his life.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
-I think it would be better to mention about some cases about people who had euthanasia to grab people’s attention at the beginning.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
-Yes, he did well organized his structure in logical order, supported his three main reasons by giving examples and I did not see any problem him using transitions, but I was quite confused when he talked about the monetary problem.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
-Yes, he restated about his arguments and ended by stressing his opinion that euthanasia should not be allowed without patient’s agreement.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
-Yes, he had appropriate pauses but without visual aids.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
-His posture and gesture were appropriate and he had good eye contact.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
-The volume was perfect, he had clear tone, and his English pronunciation was really good.
Jaewon choi-Tuesday9
ReplyDeleteSecond major assignment
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
-whether university students should live on campus or off campus. It was clearly addressed.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
-he asked to the audience where they lived. I think it was okay but couldve been stronger if he had something more interesting
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
-the structure was logical in time order. And the transitions were also adequate
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
-he tried to give the audience a message at the end which I think is quite a powerful conclusion
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
-his pauses were okay but maybe he couldve used some visual aids or humor to make the speech more interesting
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
-he looked comfortable with in positive aspect made the listener comfortable too. However I think he felt overly to comfortable which made lean and keep moving his body.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
-most of it was undestandable.
Evaluator: Emily Corbett
ReplyDeleteA Great Vacation Idea
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
Beijing China. He improved his chinese and learned about the culture.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
Yes but it could have been stronger.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
Yes. It was in chronological order about the things he learned. he used his experience and good transitions. However, there could have been more organisation in his speech.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
His conclusion gave the listeners advice about china and where to find the advice on a website.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
no
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
his body language was average and he had no speaking notes and good eye contact.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
The volume was good and i could understand the speaker well.