Thursday, June 8, 2017

Min Ji Choi/All the presentation/Tuesday 11am

1. A person I admire

https://youtu.be/UlW9Hk-sg4M 

 

2. A great vacation idea

https://youtu.be/HTOfdJvzSNc 

 

3. Ice Breaker

https://youtu.be/hw1fofs-vsQ 


4. How to make beer

https://youtu.be/d3iA2J0Aazs 


5. Opinion speech

https://youtu.be/5TBnBgSP4N0


6. Major assignment 2

https://youtu.be/uBJVI81XDnY



4 comments:

  1. Dae Young Kyoung 201500110

    1) Person I Admire
    Generic Presentation Evaluation

    What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
    She talked about how great King SeJong is and how thankful she is to him for creating Hangeul, which helped her a lot when learning Mongolian language. It was addressed directly and well.

    Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
    Yes. Not that much since it’s pointing out things that I already know. I think it can be improved if she used a hook that is more unexpected.

    Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
    Yes, she mainly used her own experiences of how Hangeul helped her. The transitions were smooth.

    Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
    The conclusion was simple but enough to finish the speech nicely.

    Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
    She did use enthusiasm in her voice but not visually. There were pauses but also sudden pauses.

    What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
    Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
    A very formal posture, but I think it fits the theme of the speech. The volume was good and everything can be understood easily, however she tends to look at her paper a bit too much. Other than that is everything is fine.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Title:Opinion speech
    Evaluator:Moon jun young
    Date: 6.8

    1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? purpose is to insist that luck does not exist.
    Luck is caused from mindset and hardworking.It was well addressed because she organizied the speech logically.
    2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
    Yes, there was a hook.It was effective
    3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
    Yes very logical she mentioned real stories.Good transitions were good.
    4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
    Yes It was concise And mian points were restated and very memorable.
    5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids, No she didn't use anything
    6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
    Her body language was good.Gesture was interesting.
    7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
    Volume was good and the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly.Everything can be understood.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Evaluater:Hyunjeong Song
    title:The person who I admire

    1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
    She introduced the people who she admires and she states why she admires King Sejong by listing his achievements.

    2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
    Yes the hook was stated in the speech but it could have been much better if she had introduced more unknown facts or rather less famous anecdotes about King Sejong.

    3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
    Yes it was. She suggested appropriate and detailed examples, and stated her experiences related to the topic.

    4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
    It was concise and manifest. The main points were briefly mentioned, and the closing part where she connected herself with the subject of the speech was quite memorable.

    5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
    Yes she did. I could see she tried hard to put a lot of effort to the presentation.

    6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
    She showed some gestures, trying to make sure she was not standing too stiff. She made constant eye contact with the audiences.

    7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly?
    The volume was very clear, with very nice intonation and stable pronunciation.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Evaluator: Koh Kyungho 201600108
    Date: 6.23
    Title : the person who I admire
    1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
    - She introduced her admiring person and argued luck is not free. Her experience which she told us in video gives us the clear point of this main point.

    2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
    - There is an intro, but I don't think it is the nice hook. It can be more interesting thing to hook the audience.

    3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
    - This is the story of hers rather than logical speech. So I can't say it has logical relationship with her main point, but the story which she gave us give us enough reasons why she admire her, and the main point I mentioned in question 1

    4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
    - Short conclusion. But it doesn't interfere the flow of presentation. It is short and restating, but It is nice concluding of her story I think.

    5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
    - She can use more pauses to improve her speech. I guess the pauses point practicing can help the presentation get much better. if the pauses are at the right point, It is more understandable

    6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
    - She used some gestures but it is not relative with the flow of presentation. She can use various body language which matches with her presentation to improve this video.

    7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
    - The volume is good. not too short or not too long. And everything she spoke is understandable. Additionally, her pronunciation is very nice!

    ReplyDelete