The person who I admire https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tPGLbeNwjC4
A great vacation idea https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HK_s7r2HCL4&feature=youtu.beIce breaker
How to vote
Unit 5 / in my opinion
University the educational venue / Major assignment |
Saturday, June 3, 2017
Cho seong in / Presentations / Tues 11-1
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Evaluater:Moon jun young
ReplyDeleteDate:6.3
title:The person who I admire
The speaker spoke about his parents who he admires most.Connection beteween he and his parents is well revealed.And his voice and tone are very good.Also organization is well prepared.But his eyesight is often focused on other direction, not on camera.Fixing his eyesight on camera is needed
overall,Despite one drawback,His presentation is audible and clear and it's organization is well prepared.He connected well himself and her parents well.
DeleteEvaluater:Moon jun young
DeleteDate:6.4
title:The person who I admire
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
He introduced the people who he admires.He admires his parents because his parents sacrifice themselves for the family and motivate the speaker
and handle the conflict easily.It is well addresed because the speaker started with the adversity in IMF 1997 and emphsized on their achievements,And directly said "The reasons that he admires them.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
No.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? yes. very logical.he provided 3 examples to each reasons.And he used First second third in his speech But transition to concluding part is not that good.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? yes It was concise. main points were not restated and summarized But the speech ended with request. the closing part was memorable
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids, No the speaker didn/t use any of these
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
His Gestures were good.It got rid of my boringness
But eye contact is often focused on other direction.And maybe tranquil poster will be better.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? Volume was good He pronounced clearly yes.Everything can be understood
Sorry I misanswered
DeleteEvaluater:Moon jun young
Date:6.4
title:The person who I admire
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
Yes.but not effective.He may as well start with some questions and then provide the main points directly
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDelete(Unit 5 In my opinion)
1.What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
To explain why sports players deserve a huge income. There are three reasons for such a high wage. Firstly, the abilities of professional players are way better than those of amateur players, influence of the sports is very powerful, and finally many industries are related to sports. The purpose of the speech and main points were clearly addressed as the speaker had a clear organization of his speech.
2.Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
The speaker began his presentation with a question that was relevant to the topic, “Do you like sports like soccer, basketball, etc.?” I think it was effective because the presenter asked a question that most male students would be interested. I think it would have been better if he had some audience to actually respond to his question to make the presentation seem more lively and interactive.
3.Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
The structure was logical. The presenter suggested specific examples which were all relevant to the points that he was making. Also, clear use of transitions such as “first”, “second”, and “third” helped the audience to follow the structure of his presentation.
4.Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
The conclusion was concise. The speaker restated his thesis once more in the end to make his points clearer. I believe the closing could be improved by summarizing his main points and making a more memorable closing such as introducing a quote or using a bit of humor.
5.Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
The speaker did not have visual aids, but the organization of the presentation was clear enough to understand. Because he had lots of specific examples which involved famous sports stars during the explanation, it appealed to the general interest of the audience. I think the speaker prepared well in choosing his topic and coming up with the main points.
6.What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
The speaker kept on looking at the camera which made me feel like he was telling his story in front of me. His posture was good, but he rarely made gestures throughout his speech. I think he can work on making a few gestures next time.
7.Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
I think the volume, speech rate, and tone of his voice were good. I was able to understand his words clearly. Because the camera was close to him in his small confined space, his voice was clearly recorded in the video. However, I felt that some of his intonation could be improved. I sometimes felt awkward when he abruptly finished his sentence without a falling intonation.
201202334 Kweonho Lee
Title: Person I admire
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Doyoun Kim
Speaker: Cho sung In
Speech value 5
: This speech was very relevant at the time and was a topic everyone could relate to. It was a very good topic
Preparation value 4
: He seemed to look at his notes time to time however it was not noticeable and his content seemed well thought of .
Organization value 4
: The organization was well thought of and clear introduction body and conclusion
Opening 4
: Since it was voting season when he opens with explanation of our voting soon, it caught my attention
Body 5
: very detailed step by step description of what to do.
Conclusion 3
: He concluded his speech suddenly, he could have given few more reasons of importance of voting or such
Transitions 4
: Since it was a step by step it was easy to transit to the next step
Maybe he could have talked a bit louder and slower. As some words were difficult to understand
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDelete(Salary of Sports stars)
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech? Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
The purpose is to tell his opinion about the money that sports stars are receiving. It was clearly addressed.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
Yes, he provided an example of famous soccer player, Ronaldo with specific numbers which was interesting.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
Yes, he had detailed examples for each points and he reasoned one by one to support his opinion. He used ‘first’ , ‘second’ and they helped as transitions.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
He restated his opinion in the end, but the closing was not memorable enough and relatively wrapped up too quickly.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
Yes, I could really see his interest and enthusiasm on the topic. It was easy to follow the ideas even though he did not have visual aids.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
He looked comfortable and he used some gestures at the right moments.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Yes, it was very clear so I could understand everything.
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteSpeaker: Cho seong in
Evaluator: Heo Sung Ji
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
: He explained how to vote. This was interesting because this president election was my first vote, so it was fun and useful.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
:He used our president election so it was good and interesting to capture our attention. It was good and many audience may want to listen his speech.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
: Yes, he speaks by explaining the step of vote.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
: Yes, he finished his speech by showing a picture which show step of vote. It was simple and good. Also, he suggested to audience to vote and call to action.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
: Yes, the last of speech he showed a picture and this was good visual aid.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gesture s.
: His eyecontact was good. It felt me that he talked to me. There was no big or special posture or gesture, this was not a big problem to understand his speech.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
: Yes, it was loud enough and also, he speaks very clear.
the person who I admire
ReplyDelete1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
He introduced his family, especially their parents. He explained how they met and care on him.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
I think there’s no apparent hook, so it was not so impressive.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
I think his logic was nice, and there was enough example(because it was his story).
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
His closing ment was a little bit hurried, but he finished his presentation well.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
There were some pauses.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
His gesture arouse my attention, and his eye contact was nice too.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
his volume, pronunciation, and delivery was really nice.
Jae Hyun Joo
Delete