Title: The laws that sex workers really wants Evaluator: Jae Hyun Lee Date: May 28th, 2017
According to the scale(1~5) from the evaluation format, (1: Excellent ~ 5: need improvement)
Speech value: 1 This is very worthy talking about because nobody knows the answer yet. This was a great speech topic to aware people that the laws regarding sex workers are important.
Preparation: 2 Visual aids were not fancy but tightly organized according to the speech flow. The presenter did not used the notes and delivered the speech very clearly.
Organization 2 I was able to get that the presenter gave us a hook at the front, following with background information, and then the reasons full criminalization of prostitution is better.
Opening 2 It is good that the presenter was inspired by the TED talk but what if she told us some more details about what was mentioned in the talk?
Body 3 Among three reasons, the presenter suggested specific example only at the last part - human trafficking- about Amsterdam and New Zealand.
Conclusion 2 Clearly restated the main idea, but could have been better if suggestion or advice were given as the last message.
Transitions 3 Within the three reason parts the transition words was not powerful enough. But used transitions throughout the whole presentation such as 'and,but,however,first,so ...'
*What could the speaker have done differently to make the speech more effective? :I wrote down in the section above. Plus, maybe she should have used some more gestures and break out from the mono-tone voice.
*What did you like about the presentation? : This is very well prepared that the presenter is fluent, confident, knows what she is saying, and I can feel that she has strong will to insist her opinion with appropriate supporting details. Most of all, I like the topic choice since it is very controversial and I worth talking about. Thanks for the great insight!
Evaluator: Lina Motzkuhn According to the scale(1~5) from the evaluation format, (1: Excellent ~ 5: need improvement)
Speech value: 1 The speech topic is very interesting, and well chosen. It is a topic that not many people would think of! Preparation: 1 The speech shows that a lot of preparation was done, as you even had statistics and a nice ppt. Organization: 1 You had a clear structure and I line throughout the whole presentation. Opening: 1 The opening was very catchy with the story and it was easy to imagine being in the same situation. Body: 2 All three body parts had clear structure and well proportioned. Conclusion: 1 The conclusion repeated her main points and reinforced her argument. Transitions: 2 There were appropriate transitions.
*What could the speaker have done differently to make the speech more effective? Your body position could be a little more confident. *What did you like about the presentation? I like that you chose a topic that is a little more serious and that others might not have thought of. I also like that even though you talk about the Ted speech, you also have points that you disagree with.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteTitle: The laws that sex workers really wants
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Jae Hyun Lee
Date: May 28th, 2017
According to the scale(1~5) from the evaluation format,
(1: Excellent ~ 5: need improvement)
Speech value: 1
This is very worthy talking about because nobody knows the answer yet. This was a great speech topic to aware people that the laws regarding sex workers are important.
Preparation: 2
Visual aids were not fancy but tightly organized according to the speech flow. The presenter did not used the notes and delivered the speech very clearly.
Organization 2
I was able to get that the presenter gave us a hook at the front, following with background information, and then the reasons full criminalization of prostitution is better.
Opening 2
It is good that the presenter was inspired by the TED talk but what if she told us some more details about what was mentioned in the talk?
Body 3
Among three reasons, the presenter suggested specific example only at the last part - human trafficking- about Amsterdam and New Zealand.
Conclusion 2
Clearly restated the main idea, but could have been better if suggestion or advice were given as the last message.
Transitions 3
Within the three reason parts the transition words was not powerful enough. But used transitions throughout the whole presentation such as 'and,but,however,first,so ...'
*What could the speaker have done differently to make the speech more effective?
:I wrote down in the section above. Plus, maybe she should have used some more gestures and break out from the mono-tone voice.
*What did you like about the presentation?
: This is very well prepared that the presenter is fluent, confident, knows what she is saying, and I can feel that she has strong will to insist her opinion with appropriate supporting details. Most of all, I like the topic choice since it is very controversial and I worth talking about. Thanks for the great insight!
Evaluator: Lina Motzkuhn
ReplyDeleteAccording to the scale(1~5) from the evaluation format,
(1: Excellent ~ 5: need improvement)
Speech value: 1
The speech topic is very interesting, and well chosen. It is a topic that not many people would think of!
Preparation: 1
The speech shows that a lot of preparation was done, as you even had statistics and a nice ppt.
Organization: 1
You had a clear structure and I line throughout the whole presentation.
Opening: 1
The opening was very catchy with the story and it was easy to imagine being in the same situation.
Body: 2
All three body parts had clear structure and well proportioned.
Conclusion: 1
The conclusion repeated her main points and reinforced her argument.
Transitions: 2
There were appropriate transitions.
*What could the speaker have done differently to make the speech more effective?
Your body position could be a little more confident.
*What did you like about the presentation?
I like that you chose a topic that is a little more serious and that others might not have thought of. I also like that even though you talk about the Ted speech, you also have points that you disagree with.