Saturday, May 20, 2017

Heo Sung ji /Smoking in public places/Tues 11a.m~1p.m

https://youtu.be/spvFT84U-_E

2 comments:

  1. Evaluator: Sung Ji young
    Speaker: Heo Sung ji
    Assignment/Title : Smoking in the public

    1. What was the speaker’s strongest main point?
    Banning smoking in the public is justifiable.
    2. What did you like about the presentation?
    The speaker had a nice pace and flow.
    3. How well did the audience get to know the speech subject?
    Pretty well.
    4. Did the speech reflect adequate preparation?
    It was well organized, and the message was clear.
    5. Did the speaker talk clearly and audibly?
    The presenter talked very clearly and audibly.
    6. Was there a definite opening, body, and conclusion?
    Yes, the presenter had a clear opening by asking a question and led on to the body with 3 reasons, along with a strong conclusion.
    7. Please comment on the speaker’s use of notes/eye contact.
    The presenter did not use any form of notes and had a great eye contact.
    8. What could the speaker have done differently that would have improved the speech?
    The speech could have been better if there were more examples included.
    9. What was your overall (positive) evaluation of the speech as a whole?
    It was well organized and presented. The presenter should be proud of herself.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Evaluator: Moon jun young
    Speaker: Heo Sung ji
    Assignment/Title : Smoking in the public
    Date: 2017.5.21

    1. What was the speaker’s strongest main point?
    smoking should be banned
    2. What did you like about the presentation?
    Its openning part was good,starting with a question.
    3. How well did the audience get to know the speech subject? very easily because subject is about smoking which is very common and most people sometimes think of
    4. Did the speech reflect adequate preparation?
    the Organization make people understand easily.
    5. Did the speaker talk clearly and audibly?
    yes very clear and audible
    6. Was there a definite opening, body, and conclusion?
    yes very clear opening body cooclusion.
    7. Please comment on the speaker’s use of notes/eye contact.
    she did not use notes and her eyes were constantly on camera.
    8. What could the speaker have done differently that would have improved the speech?
    pronunciation is audible and clear but unnatural.may be she was nervous or her tongue is sick.anyway she should improce unnatural pronounciation.
    9. What was your overall (positive) evaluation of the speech as a whole?
    Excellent reasons were impressing.and opening part was good.and her tone of voice was nice

    ReplyDelete