Wednesday, May 31, 2017

Emily Corbett/ All Presentations/ Tuesday 11-1pm

3 comments:

  1. Evaluator : 201401933 Soyun OH, Tues. 9 A.M.
    Title : 6. Final Presentation
    1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
    What is procrastination, what causes it, and how does it affect us. It was clearly addressed.
    2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
    She began her speech, giving a typical example of a college student procrastinating. I think it was an appropriate hook.
    3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
    The presenter used statistics to support her idea. And she used transitions like ‘first’, ‘secondly’, and ‘finally’ which made her speech well organized.
    4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
    She closed her speech with a question and an answer to it: To what extent has procrastination had a negative effect on my life? My biggest regret could be summed up in one word, and that’s procrastination.
    Although it was quite strong, but I think it was not persuasive enough, since the contexts were absent. I think her point would have been clearer if she added more details: her tendency to procrastinate, anecdotes about her procrastination, etc…
    5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids
    Yes, she did. It seemed that the speaker put a lot of efforts and time preparing her visual aids. Each idea was accompanied by a slide, which helped the audience get clearer idea. But I think slides could have been improved if full sentences were replaced with only fewer key words!:D
    6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
    She made constant eye contact with the audience. But since she was behind the podium, her gestures were not seen.
    7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
    The volume was good enough. Also, the speaker is very fluent in her English. Her pronunciation was fairly clear and easy to understand.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Date:6.8
    Evaluater:Moon jun young
    Title: Bees Presentation

    1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? purpose is to notify the importance of bees.
    We should protect bees for ourselves and our earth.She offered the visual aids and her english was so easy and clear.
    2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? Yes it is very efective.

    3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
    Yes,it was.And points are supported by concrete figure and the research.Her words match the painting she drawed.And She used the word "First" ,"Second" When she explains the way to preserve our bees.
    4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
    Yes it was conccies And main points were restated summarized. yes it was very memorable.
    5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids, She used the painting that she drawed.
    6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. her eye contact was good and there was no any body language.
    7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? volume was good and She enunciate and pronounce clearly. everything can be understood.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Title: Bees Presentation
    Evaluator: 201601578 Jaekyung Seo (TUES 11-13)

    1. What was the overall purpose of the speech? Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
    You talked about bees in general. You talked about how bees are important in life, and why they should be saved. You also gave suggestions that we could work on to save bees.

    2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
    The hook itself wasn’t something very strong. It was normal, and you just said it that you were going to talk about bees. But the speech itself caught my attention right away because of your visual aids. The drawings you were holding up was I think effective enough to catch the audience’s attention.

    3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
    I think your structure was logical. I had no difficulty following your speech. It was very well organized, and the links didn’t seem to be awkward at all.

    4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
    Your conclusion was quite strong because you summarized your speech at the end. But I think it could have been a little bit longer to make it more effective. But I think it was great though.

    5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
    What I loved about your speech was your visual aids. I really liked them, and those pictures made your speech one of my favorites. I think it was very interesting, and it would catch the audience’s attention right away. I think your use of visual aids were great.

    6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
    You made good eye contacts with the audience. Your posture was good too, even though there was nothing you could do much since you were holding your drawings. But I think it was clean overall.

    7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
    I could understand what you were talking about clearly. Your pronunciation was very good, and volume of your voice was audible. I had no difficulty understanding your presentation.

    ReplyDelete