Evaluator: Sung Ji young Speaker: Doyoun Kim Assignment/Title : Legalize marijuna
1. What was the speaker’s strongest main point? Medical marijuna should be legalized. 2. What did you like about the presentation? The speaker did a great job of delivering his points. 3. How well did the audience get to know the speech subject? very well. 4. Did the speech reflect adequate preparation? The presenter seems to have prepared a lot. 5. Did the speaker talk clearly and audibly? The presenter talked very clearly and audibly. 6. Was there a definite opening, body, and conclusion? The presenter had a clear opening by asking a question and led on to the body with 3 reasons, along with a strong conclusion. 7. Please comment on the speaker’s use of notes/eye contact. The presenter did not use any form of notes and had a great eye contact. 8. What could the speaker have done differently that would have improved the speech? The speech could have been better if there were more examples included. 9. What was your overall (positive) evaluation of the speech as a whole? It was well organized and presented. The presenter should be proud of himself.
Date :5.22.2017 Evaluator: Kyu Jin Lim Speaker: Doyoun Kim Assignment/Title : Legalize Weed
1. What was the speaker’s strongest main point? -Examples that support his arguments why cannabis is not bad as we think.
2. What did you like about the presentation? -Hmm... This is sensitive topic to talk about in Korea, but it was interesting about the fact that cannabis is used for medical treatment and many countries are legalizing it.
3. How well did the audience get to know the speech subject?
-I think very well, his speaking is very fluent and his explanation was simple and easy to understand.
4. Did the speech reflect adequate preparation? -Yes, he had good examples to support his argument about legalizing cannabis.
5. Did the speaker talk clearly and audibly? -Yes, he has clear tone and he pauses appropriately.
6. Was there a definite opening, body, and conclusion?
-Yes, he has clear introduction, three reasons for body, and conclusion.
7. Please comment on the speaker’s use of notes/eye contact.
-He did not use any notes and he kept his eye contact to the camera. 8. What could the speaker have done differently that would have improved the speech?
-Speaker could have given some research from the reliable source to support his examples, and also visual aids. 9. What was your overall (positive) evaluation of the speech as a whole? -In overall, I like the way he speaks with confident and his fluency in English that I didn’t have to reply the video.
Evaluator: Sung Ji young
ReplyDeleteSpeaker: Doyoun Kim
Assignment/Title : Legalize marijuna
1. What was the speaker’s strongest main point?
Medical marijuna should be legalized.
2. What did you like about the presentation?
The speaker did a great job of delivering his points.
3. How well did the audience get to know the speech subject?
very well.
4. Did the speech reflect adequate preparation?
The presenter seems to have prepared a lot.
5. Did the speaker talk clearly and audibly?
The presenter talked very clearly and audibly.
6. Was there a definite opening, body, and conclusion?
The presenter had a clear opening by asking a question and led on to the body with 3 reasons, along with a strong conclusion.
7. Please comment on the speaker’s use of notes/eye contact.
The presenter did not use any form of notes and had a great eye contact.
8. What could the speaker have done differently that would have improved the speech?
The speech could have been better if there were more examples included.
9. What was your overall (positive) evaluation of the speech as a whole?
It was well organized and presented. The presenter should be proud of himself.
Date :5.22.2017
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Kyu Jin Lim
Speaker: Doyoun Kim
Assignment/Title : Legalize Weed
1. What was the speaker’s strongest main point?
-Examples that support his arguments why cannabis is not bad as we think.
2. What did you like about the presentation?
-Hmm... This is sensitive topic to talk about in Korea, but it was interesting about the fact that cannabis is used for medical treatment and many countries are legalizing it.
3. How well did the audience get to know the speech subject?
-I think very well, his speaking is very fluent and his explanation was simple and easy to understand.
4. Did the speech reflect adequate preparation?
-Yes, he had good examples to support his argument about legalizing cannabis.
5. Did the speaker talk clearly and audibly?
-Yes, he has clear tone and he pauses appropriately.
6. Was there a definite opening, body, and conclusion?
-Yes, he has clear introduction, three reasons for body, and conclusion.
7. Please comment on the speaker’s use of notes/eye contact.
-He did not use any notes and he kept his eye contact to the camera.
8. What could the speaker have done differently that would have improved the speech?
-Speaker could have given some research from the reliable source to support his examples, and also visual aids.
9. What was your overall (positive) evaluation of the speech as a whole?
-In overall, I like the way he speaks with confident and his fluency in English that I didn’t have to reply the video.