Evaluation Guide for Organize Your Speech Title: Is Hamburger a Junk Food? Evaluator: Kyu Jin Lim Date: 2017-05-29
Speech Value (Interesting, meaningful to audience) 2 Preparation (Research, rehearsal) 2 Organization (Logical, clear) 1 Opening (Attention-getting, led into topic) 2 Body (Flowed smoothly, appropriate support material) 2 Conclusion (Effective) 2 Transitions (appropriate, helpful) 2 What could the speaker have done differently to make the speech more effective? -I gave her high points on her preparation because I could notice that she has researched a lot of information about hamburger and its origin, but she could have done better by making more eye contact toward the camera or to the audience. What did you like about the presentation? -I liked the topic she chose because I was thinking the same topic for my presentation while I was eating mom’s touch. However, I was quite skeptical about hamburger despite that I have seen movie called ‘supersize me’ before, and now I’m somewhat convinced about that hamburger itself is not unhealthy fast food since its making process could be the main reason.
Speech Value (Interesting, meaningful to audience) 2 - the topic was very interesting and she had a clear opinion. Preparation (Research, rehearsal) 2 - She had a lot information prepared to support her argument and also visual aids. Organization (Logical, clear) 1 – It was well organized in logical order. Opening (Attention-getting, led into topic) 2 – She had a good opening by asking questions towards audience which caught attention. Body (Flowed smoothly, appropriate support material) 2 – She had many examples and evidence to support her argument. Conclusion (Effective) 2 – She concluded clearly and effectively. Transitions (appropriate, helpful) 2 – It was very smooth and appropriate.
• Speech Value : 1, The topic is light, interesting and easy to follow and also it has her opinion included(whether the burger is junk food or not). • Preparation : 2, She had good simple ppt slides and contents that went along well. • Organization : 2, I could tell that it was outlined clearly. • Opening : 1, started by question, which caught attention. • Body : 3, it was well organized with enough details, but I thought the history part was a little off-topic or she could have made stronger connection between the history and the burger becoming known as a junk food. • Conclusion : 2, strong and clear • Transitions : 2, appropriate transitions were used What could the speaker have done differently to make the speech more effective? She could have done better eye contacts by looking up towards the audience or the camera. What did you like about the presentation? I liked the topic about the prejudice on burgers which was interesting and how she proved it was wrong using the definition of the word ‘junk food’.
Title: Is hamburger junk food Evaluator: Doyoun Kim Speaker: Joh YeonKyeong
Speech value 4 : I also love hamburger and this topic was very fun to listen to Preparation value 3 : She had ppt however her eyes seem to be reading something and not keeping eye contact Organization value 4 : It is well organized as it begins with the question on topic, and history of burger, her answer and why she thinks so. This seems to be well organized Opening 4 : It is a very good opening as it questions what most people think. Body 4 :She gives very good empirical evidence and clear definition of what junk food is and why it isn’t so.. Conclusion 3 : The conclusion seems a bit short, even though it has all essential information it seems a bit abrupt and no closing hook. Transitions 4 : With the usage of ppt, transition is very natural. There were some usage of conjunction and words such as “therefore” that connects the topics. I think she could have made more eye-contact
Generic Presentation Evaluation Evaluator: Park So Yeon/ Tue 11 Presenter: Joh YeonKyeong Presentation Topic: Is hamburger a junk food? 1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? -Whether hamburger should be classified as a junk food. She started with the origin of burgers and talked about why burgers aren’t junk food 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? -Yes she started her speech by asking her audience a question 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? -Yes she had a nice structure and had sufficient amount of examples 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? -She made a conclusion concise but didn’t have an overall summary 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids? -She made short pauses in her speech and used visual aids 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. -She made good eye contact with her audience 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? -She spoke in a slow pace which was easy to follow and she spoke clearly as well. The content wasn’t hard so everything was understandable
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? - This video is the video we watched in the class. It's about the hamburger often classified as a junk food. Her main point is the hamburger is not junk food. It is well addressed with virtual aids.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? - the hook is the form of asking, about hamburger well known as junk food.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? - She use many materials to support her main point, and it is effective. The materials with virtual aids has logical relationship with her main point.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? - She restates her main idea in the end, but it is just repeating the main point. I think it can be improved by correcting the conclusion fully including the information of the materials which she used.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids? - She used visual aids effectively, but the screen is little bit small to see. Her presentation also has pauses so I can understand her point with no obstacles.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. - She used little body language. It can be better with body language supporting seeing the materials she gave through the screen.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? - The volume is nice. She enunciate and pronounce clearly and easy to understand. The tempo of speech is nice, too
Evaluation Guide for Organize Your Speech
ReplyDeleteTitle: Is Hamburger a Junk Food?
Evaluator: Kyu Jin Lim
Date: 2017-05-29
Speech Value (Interesting, meaningful to audience) 2
Preparation (Research, rehearsal) 2
Organization (Logical, clear) 1
Opening (Attention-getting, led into topic) 2
Body (Flowed smoothly, appropriate support material) 2
Conclusion (Effective) 2
Transitions (appropriate, helpful) 2
What could the speaker have done differently to make the speech more effective?
-I gave her high points on her preparation because I could notice that she has researched a lot of information about hamburger and its origin, but she could have done better by making more eye contact toward the camera or to the audience.
What did you like about the presentation?
-I liked the topic she chose because I was thinking the same topic for my presentation while I was eating mom’s touch. However, I was quite skeptical about hamburger despite that I have seen movie called ‘supersize me’ before, and now I’m somewhat convinced about that hamburger itself is not unhealthy fast food since its making process could be the main reason.
Speech Value (Interesting, meaningful to audience) 2 - the topic was very interesting and she had a clear opinion.
DeletePreparation (Research, rehearsal) 2 - She had a lot information prepared to support her argument and also visual aids.
Organization (Logical, clear) 1 – It was well organized in logical order.
Opening (Attention-getting, led into topic) 2 – She had a good opening by asking questions towards audience which caught attention.
Body (Flowed smoothly, appropriate support material) 2 – She had many examples and evidence to support her argument.
Conclusion (Effective) 2 – She concluded clearly and effectively.
Transitions (appropriate, helpful) 2 – It was very smooth and appropriate.
Title: Is Burger Junk food?
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Minhee Woo (Tuesday11-13)
Date: 2017-05-29
• Speech Value : 1, The topic is light, interesting and easy to follow and also it has her opinion included(whether the burger is junk food or not).
• Preparation : 2, She had good simple ppt slides and contents that went along well.
• Organization : 2, I could tell that it was outlined clearly.
• Opening : 1, started by question, which caught attention.
• Body : 3, it was well organized with enough details, but I thought the history part was a little off-topic or she could have made stronger connection between the history and the burger becoming known as a junk food.
• Conclusion : 2, strong and clear
• Transitions : 2, appropriate transitions were used
What could the speaker have done differently to make the speech more effective?
She could have done better eye contacts by looking up towards the audience or the camera.
What did you like about the presentation?
I liked the topic about the prejudice on burgers which was interesting and how she proved it was wrong using the definition of the word ‘junk food’.
Title: Is hamburger junk food
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Doyoun Kim
Speaker: Joh YeonKyeong
Speech value 4
: I also love hamburger and this topic was very fun to listen to
Preparation value 3
: She had ppt however her eyes seem to be reading something and not keeping eye contact
Organization value 4
: It is well organized as it begins with the question on topic, and history of burger, her answer and why she thinks so. This seems to be well organized
Opening 4
: It is a very good opening as it questions what most people think.
Body 4
:She gives very good empirical evidence and clear definition of what junk food is and why it isn’t so..
Conclusion 3
: The conclusion seems a bit short, even though it has all essential information it seems a bit abrupt and no closing hook.
Transitions 4
: With the usage of ppt, transition is very natural. There were some usage of conjunction and words such as “therefore” that connects the topics.
I think she could have made more eye-contact
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Park So Yeon/ Tue 11
Presenter: Joh YeonKyeong
Presentation Topic: Is hamburger a junk food?
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
-Whether hamburger should be classified as a junk food. She started with the origin of burgers and talked about why burgers aren’t junk food
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
-Yes she started her speech by asking her audience a question
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
-Yes she had a nice structure and had sufficient amount of examples
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
-She made a conclusion concise but didn’t have an overall summary
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
-She made short pauses in her speech and used visual aids
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
-She made good eye contact with her audience
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
-She spoke in a slow pace which was easy to follow and she spoke clearly as well. The content wasn’t hard so everything was understandable
Evaluator: Koh Kyungho 201600108
ReplyDeleteDate: 6.23
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
- This video is the video we watched in the class. It's about the hamburger often classified as a junk food. Her main point is the hamburger is not junk food. It is well addressed with virtual aids.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
- the hook is the form of asking, about hamburger well known as junk food.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
- She use many materials to support her main point, and it is effective. The materials with virtual aids has logical relationship with her main point.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
- She restates her main idea in the end, but it is just repeating the main point. I think it can be improved by correcting the conclusion fully including the information of the materials which she used.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
- She used visual aids effectively, but the screen is little bit small to see. Her presentation also has pauses so I can understand her point with no obstacles.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
- She used little body language. It can be better with body language supporting seeing the materials she gave through the screen.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
- The volume is nice. She enunciate and pronounce clearly and easy to understand. The tempo of speech is nice, too