Date :6.3 Evaluator:Moon jun young Speaker:Kyoung dae young Assignment/Title :The great vacation idea
1. What was the speakers strongest main point? He spoke about the bonito which is the eco-tourism hub 2. What did you like about the presentation? His explanation about the bonito's beautiful feature. and his flow and voice is very clear and audible 3. How well did the audience get to know the speech subject? Audience will get to know the speech because He started with interesting opening and he explains very well about the bonito. 4. Did the speech reflect adequate preparation? Yes.I think he practiced a lot. 5. Did the speaker talk clearly and audibly? yes very clear 6. Was there a definite opening, body, and conclusion? Yes.He started with other people'preference so that I can easily quess the opening part is ongoing And he provided the main features of bonito in advance.So I can easily anticiapte that main body part will start,And there is the word "summury" that makes people know that the speaker will mention conclusion part 7. Please comment on the speaker’s use of notes/eye contact. His eyesight is good and he don't use any notes. 8. What could the speaker have done differently that would have improved the speech? He sometimes swinged his body.So I think a still posture will be better. 9. What was your overall (positive) evaluation of the speech as a whole? He spoke about bonito very interestingly And organization is very good. his voice, pronunciation and flow is good.
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? He tries to introduce his favorite tourism site , Bonito.In bonito There are many beautiful spectacles and interesting activities to do. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? Yes it is very effective.And adding more adjectives will be better. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? Yes logical.He started with other people's preference and provided his preference And naturally introduce Bonito.And mentioned main spectacles in advance.And started main body parts.And he used "in summary" for conclusion part. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? Yes very concise.Main points were restated and summarized. yes. very memorable. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids, He did not use anything 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. Eye contact is fixed on the camera and posture was distraction because he swinged his body side to side.Gesture was very effective 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? Yes whole speech was audible and clear. Everything can be understood.
Generic Presentation Evaluation (6. Organize Your Speech) 1.What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? To inform people of the etiquettes in Korea. There are two things to consider when you want to participate in Korea which are choice of words and age. You have to differentiate your language to show respects to the people. In case of age, you have to treat older people carefully as not to offend them. The purpose of the speech and main points were clearly addressed as the speaker had a clear organization of his speech.
2.Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? The speaker began her presentation with a question that was relevant to the topic, “Have you ever been in a situation where you ask yourself how you must treat someone or a guest?” I think it was effective because the presenter asked a question that most of the people would answer in a positive way. I think it would have been better if had some audience to actually respond to his question to make the presentation seem more lively and interactive.
3.Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? The structure was logical. The presenter mostly talked about his personal experience and they were all relevant to the points that he was making. Also, clear use of transitions such as “first of all”, “let’s move on to the next point”, and “in summary” helped the audience to follow the structure of his presentation.
4.Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? The conclusion was concise. The speaker was saying that we must be careful of how we speak to people in Korea. We must consider the age and carefully choose words that suit the situation. The speaker summarized his main points clearly and finished his speech with some final comments. I believe the closing could be improved by making it more memorable such as introducing a quote or using a bit of humor.
5.Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids, The speaker did not have visual aids, but the organization of the presentation was clear enough to understand. Because he introduced his personal experience during the explanation, it appealed to the interest of the audience and there were some aspects of humor in his episodes. I think the speaker prepared well in choosing his topic and coming up with the main points.
6.What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. The speaker kept on looking at the camera which made me feel like he was telling his story in front of me. His posture was good, and he sometimes made gestures in transitions when he was introducing his main points which were nice.
7.Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? I think the volume, speech rate, and tone of his voice is perfect. I was able to understand his words clearly and it made me feel comfortable. Because the camera was close to him in his small confined space, his voice was clearly recorded in the video. The pronunciation was great!
June 5th, evaluation for '6. Organize your speech'
1.What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? - It is to tell the audience importance of age in Korean society. It was addressed in coherent and logical manner.
2.Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? - He is referring to audience's experience which makes it interesting to think about. I think this was great.
3.Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? - Very logical. It is supported by specific experiences of presenter. Seamless transitions were used.
4.Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? - He concludes with saying, 'In summary' and this signifies that he is going to wrap everything up. He summarized his experience and what he felt again, which was very effective and memorable.
5.Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids, - No enthusiasm and humor but I could feel his very honest emotions. It might have been better with visual aids.
6.What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. -Because he was filming himself very close, I could not recognize much about all of these.
7.Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? -Volume was ok and I want to give the highest score for the enunciation and pronunciation. It made the whole speech very clear and understandable.
Generic Presentation Evaluation (School Uniforms) 1. What was the overall purpose of the speech? Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? The purpose is to tell his opinion about the school uniforms and it was well addressed with three reasons why he agrees with the idea of uniforms. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? There was no clear hook, but he guided the audience well by introducing the topic and his opinion to it. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? Yes, he had detailed examples for each points and he reasoned one by one to support his opinion. He used ‘first’ , ‘second’ and they helped as transitions. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? He restated his opinion in the end and summarized his reasons nicely in the conclusion. However, he could have emphasized his opinion with quotes or some sentences so it can be more memorable 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids? Yes, I could see his interest on the topic. It was easy to follow the ideas even though he did not have visual aids. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. He looked comfortable and he used some gestures at the right moments. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? Yes, it was very clear so I could understand everything.
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? - The overall purpose of the speech was about etiquette which is polite behaviors, and Korean ones captivated speaker’s interest. He mentioned that we have to respect and talk polite whether we like it or not by choice of words and by our age. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? -He grabbed attention by asking if we have ever been in situation asking ourselves how to treat someone else. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? -Yes, he did well organized his structure in logical order, supported his two etiquettes by giving examples of why it should be followed in Korea society for our sake and he did not have any problem using transitions. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? -Yes, he restated about two etiquettes and we have to be careful of our word choice and by our age, because that is how it works in Korea. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids, -Yes, he had appropriate pauses but he did not use visual aids. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. -His posture and gesture were appropriate and he had good eye contact. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? -His tone was appropriate and clear, and his pronunciation was good and speaks very fluently.
Evaluator: Cho seong in Date: 6. 8 Title: In my opinion: School uniforms. 1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? His opinion is that a school uniform is good because of some reasons. He first told a opposing opinion and then he talked about his opinion and three reasons of the opinion. It was well addressed. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? I think there was a hook and it was kind of effective one. But I think it can be improved by stressing the hook. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? It was logical. The point was supported by three reasons. And there were natural transitions between the ideas. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? He restated his opinion and summarized the reason. It made the concise conclusion and made the closing much memorable. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids, Even though he didn’t use any visual aids, he kept making pauses between the sentences and it helped the audience to understand and organize what he said. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. His eye contact and the hand gestures were really good and I think it means that he did well prepare. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? The voice was audible and clear enough to listen. Everything could be easily understood.
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? -To introduce Bonito as a good vacation spot. He states that there are many good sights to see and activities to do. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? -Yes there was a hook but it could have been stronger. Maybe give a visual for us to imagine. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? Yes. Yes examples and evidence. Good transitions. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? Yes. Main points were restated and it was memorable. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids, No 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. He made eye contact and gestures. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? The volume was good, his speech was audible and clear.
Date :6.3
ReplyDeleteEvaluator:Moon jun young
Speaker:Kyoung dae young
Assignment/Title :The great vacation idea
1. What was the speakers strongest main point?
He spoke about the bonito which is the eco-tourism hub
2. What did you like about the presentation?
His explanation about the bonito's beautiful feature.
and his flow and voice is very clear and audible
3. How well did the audience get to know the speech subject? Audience will get to know the speech because He started with interesting opening and he explains very well about the bonito.
4. Did the speech reflect adequate preparation? Yes.I think he practiced a lot.
5. Did the speaker talk clearly and audibly? yes very clear
6. Was there a definite opening, body, and conclusion? Yes.He started with other people'preference so that I can easily quess the opening part is ongoing And he provided the main features of bonito in advance.So I can easily anticiapte that main body part will start,And there is the word "summury" that makes people know that the speaker will mention conclusion part
7. Please comment on the speaker’s use of notes/eye contact. His eyesight is good and he don't use any notes.
8. What could the speaker have done differently that would have improved the speech? He sometimes swinged his body.So
I think a still posture will be better.
9. What was your overall (positive) evaluation of the speech as a whole? He spoke about bonito very interestingly And organization is very good. his voice, pronunciation and flow is good.
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? He tries to introduce his favorite tourism site , Bonito.In bonito There are many beautiful spectacles and interesting activities to do.
ReplyDelete2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? Yes it is very effective.And adding more adjectives will be better.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
Yes logical.He started with other people's preference and provided his preference And naturally introduce Bonito.And mentioned main spectacles in advance.And started main body parts.And he used "in summary" for conclusion part.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
Yes very concise.Main points were restated and summarized. yes. very memorable.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids, He did not use anything
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. Eye contact is fixed on the camera and posture was distraction because he swinged his body side to side.Gesture was very effective
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Yes whole speech was audible and clear. Everything can be understood.
Date :6.3
DeleteEvaluator:Moon jun young
Speaker:Kyoung dae young
Assignment/Title :The great vacation idea
I am so sorry for my mistkae
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDelete(6. Organize Your Speech)
1.What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
To inform people of the etiquettes in Korea. There are two things to consider when you want to participate in Korea which are choice of words and age. You have to differentiate your language to show respects to the people. In case of age, you have to treat older people carefully as not to offend them. The purpose of the speech and main points were clearly addressed as the speaker had a clear organization of his speech.
2.Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
The speaker began her presentation with a question that was relevant to the topic, “Have you ever been in a situation where you ask yourself how you must treat someone or a guest?” I think it was effective because the presenter asked a question that most of the people would answer in a positive way. I think it would have been better if had some audience to actually respond to his question to make the presentation seem more lively and interactive.
3.Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
The structure was logical. The presenter mostly talked about his personal experience and they were all relevant to the points that he was making. Also, clear use of transitions such as “first of all”, “let’s move on to the next point”, and “in summary” helped the audience to follow the structure of his presentation.
4.Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
The conclusion was concise. The speaker was saying that we must be careful of how we speak to people in Korea. We must consider the age and carefully choose words that suit the situation. The speaker summarized his main points clearly and finished his speech with some final comments. I believe the closing could be improved by making it more memorable such as introducing a quote or using a bit of humor.
5.Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
The speaker did not have visual aids, but the organization of the presentation was clear enough to understand. Because he introduced his personal experience during the explanation, it appealed to the interest of the audience and there were some aspects of humor in his episodes. I think the speaker prepared well in choosing his topic and coming up with the main points.
6.What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
The speaker kept on looking at the camera which made me feel like he was telling his story in front of me. His posture was good, and he sometimes made gestures in transitions when he was introducing his main points which were nice.
7.Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
I think the volume, speech rate, and tone of his voice is perfect. I was able to understand his words clearly and it made me feel comfortable. Because the camera was close to him in his small confined space, his voice was clearly recorded in the video. The pronunciation was great!
201202334 Kweonho Lee
201102634 Lee Jae Hyun
ReplyDeleteJune 5th, evaluation for '6. Organize your speech'
1.What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
- It is to tell the audience importance of age in Korean society. It was addressed in coherent and logical manner.
2.Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
- He is referring to audience's experience which makes it interesting to think about. I think this was great.
3.Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
- Very logical. It is supported by specific experiences of presenter. Seamless transitions were used.
4.Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
- He concludes with saying, 'In summary' and this signifies that he is going to wrap everything up. He summarized his experience and what he felt again, which was very effective and memorable.
5.Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
- No enthusiasm and humor but I could feel his very honest emotions. It might have been better with visual aids.
6.What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
-Because he was filming himself very close, I could not recognize much about all of these.
7.Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
-Volume was ok and I want to give the highest score for the enunciation and pronunciation. It made the whole speech very clear and understandable.
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDelete(School Uniforms)
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech? Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
The purpose is to tell his opinion about the school uniforms and it was well addressed with three reasons why he agrees with the idea of uniforms.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
There was no clear hook, but he guided the audience well by introducing the topic and his opinion to it.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
Yes, he had detailed examples for each points and he reasoned one by one to support his opinion. He used ‘first’ , ‘second’ and they helped as transitions.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
He restated his opinion in the end and summarized his reasons nicely in the conclusion. However, he could have emphasized his opinion with quotes or some sentences so it can be more memorable
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
Yes, I could see his interest on the topic. It was easy to follow the ideas even though he did not have visual aids.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
He looked comfortable and he used some gestures at the right moments.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Yes, it was very clear so I could understand everything.
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
ReplyDelete- The overall purpose of the speech was about etiquette which is polite behaviors, and Korean ones captivated speaker’s interest. He mentioned that we have to respect and talk polite whether we like it or not by choice of words and by our age.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
-He grabbed attention by asking if we have ever been in situation asking ourselves how to treat someone else.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
-Yes, he did well organized his structure in logical order, supported his two etiquettes by giving examples of why it should be followed in Korea society for our sake and he did not have any problem using transitions.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
-Yes, he restated about two etiquettes and we have to be careful of our word choice and by our age, because that is how it works in Korea.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
-Yes, he had appropriate pauses but he did not use visual aids.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
-His posture and gesture were appropriate and he had good eye contact.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
-His tone was appropriate and clear, and his pronunciation was good and speaks very fluently.
Evaluator: Cho seong in
ReplyDeleteDate: 6. 8
Title: In my opinion: School uniforms.
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
His opinion is that a school uniform is good because of some reasons. He first told a opposing opinion and then he talked about his opinion and three reasons of the opinion. It was well addressed.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
I think there was a hook and it was kind of effective one. But I think it can be improved by stressing the hook.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
It was logical. The point was supported by three reasons. And there were natural transitions between the ideas.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
He restated his opinion and summarized the reason. It made the concise conclusion and made the closing much memorable.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
Even though he didn’t use any visual aids, he kept making pauses between the sentences and it helped the audience to understand and organize what he said.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
His eye contact and the hand gestures were really good and I think it means that he did well prepare.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
The voice was audible and clear enough to listen. Everything could be easily understood.
Evaluator: Emily Corbett
ReplyDeleteA Great Vacation Idea
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
-To introduce Bonito as a good vacation spot. He states that there are many good sights to see and activities to do.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
-Yes there was a hook but it could have been stronger. Maybe give a visual for us to imagine.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
Yes. Yes examples and evidence. Good transitions.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
Yes. Main points were restated and it was memorable.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
No
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
He made eye contact and gestures.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
The volume was good, his speech was audible and clear.