Generic Presentation Evaluation First speech evaluater: Lina Motzkuhn 1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? The main purpose of the speech was to show why he admired park Jonghan. He made clear points so it was well addressed. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? It was more a greeting than a hook, so that could be improved by using an interesting fact or something like that. But as this was the first speech we had not really talked about that yet 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? The structure was clear, and his points were supported by examples of what that person did. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? His conclusion is good, as it restates his point. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids, He did not use any visual aids, but he paused in between sometimes. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. He uses hand gestures but not too much. He is sitting down so you can’t really see his body language. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? Yes, the volume was clear and understandable.
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteFirst speech
evaluater: Lina Motzkuhn
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
The main purpose of the speech was to show why he admired park Jonghan. He made clear points so it was well addressed.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
It was more a greeting than a hook, so that could be improved by using an interesting fact or something like that. But as this was the first speech we had not really talked about that yet
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
The structure was clear, and his points were supported by examples of what that person did.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
His conclusion is good, as it restates his point.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
He did not use any visual aids, but he paused in between sometimes.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
He uses hand gestures but not too much. He is sitting down so you can’t really see his body language.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Yes, the volume was clear and understandable.