1. The Person I Admire: Swimmer Park Tae Hwan
2. Great Vacation Idea: My Wonderful Visit to the Silicon Valley
3. Looking Back on My Life: What I Regret
4. How-to Speech : Making Iced Latte with Espresso Machine
5. Homosexuality Should Be Respected
6. Artificial Intelligence: Can It Replace Human?
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDelete(Artificial Intelligence)
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
The purpose is to discuss whether the AIs can replace humans and give the speaker’s personal opinion.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
Yes, he started with a question related to the topic. Also he guided the audience about the whole speech in the beginning, which made easier to follow.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
Yes, interesting examples using movies, recent happenings, scientific facts, etc.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
Yes, he wrapped up with a quote, which was memorable and he restated his opinion clearly.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
I could really see the enthusiasm and interest on the topic. Also he used nice visual aids with informative images and words on the slides.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
He moved time to time, looked comfortable, appropriate eye contacts with the audience and natural gestures throughout the speech.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Yes, it was very clear so I could understand everything.
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDelete(Making Iced Latte with Espresso Machine)
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
How to make Ice Latte with Espresso Machine. There several steps to making it. The speaker did a good job of explaining the steps.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
Yes, the hook was effective because it analyzed the current coffee market and why it is important to know how to make this latte.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
The speaker explained it well by giving thorough steps to making the latte. It was fairly easy to follow.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
Yes, the speaker closed his presentation with a remark over his outcome, which was actually funny and memorable.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
The speaker actually made the latte with the espresso machine, which helped the audience to clearly understand.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
The speaker acted out all of the steps that he was explaining, which showed enthusiasm.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
The volume was loud enough to hear what he has to say and his pronunciation was clear and understandable.
Evaluator: Cho seong in
ReplyDeleteTitle: Presentation 5 In my opinion / date 6.8
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
The main point was LGBT people should be respected. His presentation was well addressed. He first told about a story which he had experienced when he had been in the Canada and then he told two reasons why LGBT people should be respected.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
I didn’t notice a hook. Even though I didn’t notice it, the presentation was good.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
He did support his opinion by telling about the experience and the reason why we should respect the LGBT. And I think it was a good transition between the ideas.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
He restated the main points. And the conclusion was concise.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
He didn’t use visual aids, but I think he did use pauses to make audience understand what he said.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
He kept trying to make eye contact with the camera. Even though he did not use much gesture, it was good.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Yeah I think it was not hard to understand what he said. The volume was good. This presentation was audible and clear enough to listen. But I think there was much unnecessary expression like umm… uh…. If he reduce those expressions, it could improve his speech.
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Park So Yeon/Tue 11
Title: Looking back on my life: Things that I regret
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
-The things that he regrets in life and the lessons he learned through the stories he told us
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
-Yes he asked a question to introduce the topic so it was effective.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
-Yes he stated specific personal experiences and the structure of the speech was good.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
-Yes, at the end of his stories he would state his conclusions but I don’t think he summarized them
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
-He used visual aids for his speech but not much humor
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
-He made good eye contact and many hand gestures
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
-I think everyone was able to understand his speech but there was something wrong with the sounds